Pupil Development Grant Expenditure
This statement details our school’s use of the PDG for the 2026 to 2027 academic year.
It outlines our strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending had within our school.
If your numbers are 5 and below please use a * instead of the allocation to protect the identification of children.
School Overview
|
Detail |
Data |
|
School name |
Ffederaliaeth Ysgol Penrhyn-coch ac Ysgol Penllwyn |
|
Number of learners in school |
165 |
|
Proportion (%) of PDG eligible learners |
16% |
|
Date this statement was published |
April 2026 |
|
Date on which it will be reviewed |
April 2027 |
|
Statement authorised by |
C E Lawrence |
|
PDG Lead |
C E Lawrence |
|
Governor Lead |
Adrian Price |
Funding Overview
|
Detail |
Amount |
|
PDG funding allocation this academic year |
£24,150 |
|
Penllwyn Allocation |
£5750 |
|
Penrhyn-coch Allocation |
£18400 |
|
Total budget for this academic year
|
£858,446 |
Part A: Strategy Plan
Statement of intent
|
The purpose of our Pupil Deprivation Grant (PDG) strategy is to reduce barriers faced by pupils experiencing poverty and to ensure all learners achieve their full potential. At Ysgol Penrhyn‑coch, we are committed to high expectations for every child, alongside strong support for wellbeing, inclusion, and engagement. Our approach is holistic and evidence‑based, combining targeted academic and wellbeing interventions with enrichment opportunities, community engagement, and practical support to remove financial barriers. We work closely with pupils, families, and partner agencies to promote confidence, aspiration, and a strong sense of belonging. PDG provision is closely monitored by senior leaders and governors to ensure the funding has a meaningful and lasting impact on pupils’ learning, wellbeing, and participation in all aspects of school life. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
|
Improved attainment in literacy and numeracy for pupils eligible for FSM |
Pupils make measurable progress in standardised assessments and class‑based assessment; gaps between FSM pupils and peers narrow |
|
Improved wellbeing, engagement and attitudes to learning |
Improved attendance and punctuality; pupils demonstrate more positive attitudes to learning and improved emotional regulation |
|
Increased participation of FSM pupils in wider school life |
Increased uptake of extra‑curricular activities, educational visits and enrichment opportunities by FSM pupils |
|
Raised aspirations and confidence |
Pupils demonstrate increased confidence, self‑belief and willingness to engage in new challenges; improved pupil voice |
|
Improved inclusion and access to learning
|
Financial barriers reduced through subsidy of trips, uniform and resources; pupils fully access curriculum experiences |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our PDG this academic year to achieve the intended outcomes listed above
Learning and teaching
Budgeted cost: £ 11,000
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
|
Small‑group and 1:1 literacy and numeracy interventions delivered by Teaching Assistants |
EEF evidence shows targeted small‑group tuition and reading interventions have high impact, particularly for disadvantaged pupils |
|
Structured reading and language programmes (e.g. Dyfal Donc / Catch Up, Nessy, Reading Co) |
Strong evidence base for phonics, reading comprehension and oral language interventions |
|
High expectations and inclusive classroom practice (RADY approach) |
Research indicates that high expectations and inclusive teaching improve outcomes for disadvantaged learners |
Community Focused Schools (to include: (i) building strong partnerships with families; (ii) responding to the needs of the community; (iii) collaborating with other services)
Budgeted cost: £1200
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
|
Engagement with external agencies (Health, TAF, Early Help, Young Carers, Advocacy services) |
Multi‑agency working improves attendance, wellbeing and family stability |
|
Parent engagement initiatives and practical support |
EEF identifies parental engagement as having a positive impact on pupil outcomes, particularly for FSM learners |
|
Community‑based learning opportunities (volunteering, gardening, Forest School) |
Evidence shows community learning improves engagement, confidence and attendance |
Wider strategies (for example and where applicable, Health and Well-being, Curriculum and Qualifications, Leadership and Raising Aspirations)
Budgeted cost: £ 12,650
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
|
LSA mentoring and wellbeing support |
Social and Emotional Learning has moderate impact on attainment and wellbeing (EEF) |
|
Subsidised educational visits, swimming lessons and enrichment activities |
Removes financial barriers and increases access to cultural capital |
|
Food provision (daily fruit, packed food for visits) |
Research shows hunger negatively affects concentration and learning |
|
Subsidy for school uniform and essential resources |
Reduces stigma and improves attendance and inclusion |
|
Leadership and staff professional learning focused on disadvantage |
Estyn highlights strong leadership as critical to improving outcomes for disadvantaged pupils |
|
Arts, sport and extra‑curricular participation |
Evidence links wider participation with improved aspirations, confidence and social mobility |
Total budgeted cost: £24,150
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
PDG outcomes
This details the impact that our PDG activity had on pupils in the 2025 to 2026 academic year.
|
Activity |
Impact |
|
Targeted literacy and numeracy interventions |
Improved progress for FSM pupils; gaps starting to narrow |
|
Wellbeing and mentoring support |
Improved emotional regulation, engagement and attendance |
|
Enrichment and extra‑curricular opportunities |
Increased participation and improved pupil confidence |
|
Practical support (food, uniform, trips) |
Reduced barriers to learning and improved inclusion |
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help us identify which ones are popular in Wales.
|
Programme |
Provider |
|
Dyfal Donc / Catch Up Reading |
External literacy providers |
|
Nessy Learning Programme |
Nessy |
|
ELSA |
Educational Psychology Service / Local Authority |
Further information (optional)
|
Our PDG strategy is aligned with the School Development Plan and takes a holistic, whole‑school approach to addressing disadvantage. Funding decisions are informed by evidence‑based research, staff expertise and ongoing analysis of pupil need. The impact of PDG spending is regularly monitored by senior leaders and scrutinised by the Governing Body to ensure accountability and sustained improvement for pupils from low‑income households.
|