Skip to content ↓

Pupil Development Grant Expenditure

This statement details our school’s use of the PDG for the 2026 to 2027 academic year.

 

It outlines our strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending had within our school.

 

If your numbers are 5 and below please use a * instead of the allocation to protect the identification of children.

 

School Overview

 

Detail

Data

School name

Ffederaliaeth Ysgol Penrhyn-coch ac Ysgol Penllwyn

Number of learners in school

 165

Proportion (%) of PDG eligible learners

 16%

Date this statement was published

 April 2026

Date on which it will be reviewed

 April 2027

Statement authorised by

 C E Lawrence

PDG Lead

 C E Lawrence

Governor Lead

 Adrian Price

 

Funding Overview

 

Detail

Amount

PDG funding allocation this academic year

£24,150

 Penllwyn Allocation

£5750

 Penrhyn-coch Allocation

£18400

Total budget for this academic year

 

£858,446

 

 

 

 

Part A: Strategy Plan

 

Statement of intent

 

The purpose of our Pupil Deprivation Grant (PDG) strategy is to reduce barriers faced by pupils experiencing poverty and to ensure all learners achieve their full potential. At Ysgol Penrhyn‑coch, we are committed to high expectations for every child, alongside strong support for wellbeing, inclusion, and engagement.

Our approach is holistic and evidence‑based, combining targeted academic and wellbeing interventions with enrichment opportunities, community engagement, and practical support to remove financial barriers. We work closely with pupils, families, and partner agencies to promote confidence, aspiration, and a strong sense of belonging.

PDG provision is closely monitored by senior leaders and governors to ensure the funding has a meaningful and lasting impact on pupils’ learning, wellbeing, and participation in all aspects of school life.

 

Intended outcomes

 

This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.

Intended outcome

Success criteria

Improved attainment in literacy and numeracy for pupils eligible for FSM

Pupils make measurable progress in standardised assessments and class‑based assessment; gaps between FSM pupils and peers narrow

Improved wellbeing, engagement and attitudes to learning

Improved attendance and punctuality; pupils demonstrate more positive attitudes to learning and improved emotional regulation

Increased participation of FSM pupils in wider school life

Increased uptake of extra‑curricular activities, educational visits and enrichment opportunities by FSM pupils

Raised aspirations and confidence

Pupils demonstrate increased confidence, self‑belief and willingness to engage in new challenges; improved pupil voice

Improved inclusion and access to learning

 

Financial barriers reduced through subsidy of trips, uniform and resources; pupils fully access curriculum experiences

 

Activity in this academic year

 

This details how we intend to spend our PDG this academic year to achieve the intended outcomes listed above

 

Learning and teaching

 

Budgeted cost: £ 11,000

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Small‑group and 1:1 literacy and numeracy interventions delivered by Teaching Assistants

EEF evidence shows targeted small‑group tuition and reading interventions have high impact, particularly for disadvantaged pupils

Structured reading and language programmes (e.g. Dyfal Donc / Catch Up, Nessy, Reading Co)

Strong evidence base for phonics, reading comprehension and oral language interventions

High expectations and inclusive classroom practice (RADY approach)

Research indicates that high expectations and inclusive teaching improve outcomes for disadvantaged learners

 

 

 

 

Community Focused Schools (to include: (i) building strong partnerships with families; (ii) responding to the needs of the community; (iii) collaborating with other services)

 

 Budgeted cost: £1200

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Engagement with external agencies (Health, TAF, Early Help, Young Carers, Advocacy services)

Multi‑agency working improves attendance, wellbeing and family stability

Parent engagement initiatives and practical support

EEF identifies parental engagement as having a positive impact on pupil outcomes, particularly for FSM learners

Community‑based learning opportunities (volunteering, gardening, Forest School)

Evidence shows community learning improves engagement, confidence and attendance

 

Wider strategies (for example and where applicable, Health and Well-being, Curriculum and Qualifications, Leadership and Raising Aspirations)

 

Budgeted cost: £ 12,650

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

LSA mentoring and wellbeing support

Social and Emotional Learning has moderate impact on attainment and wellbeing (EEF)

Subsidised educational visits, swimming lessons and enrichment activities

Removes financial barriers and increases access to cultural capital

Food provision (daily fruit, packed food for visits)

Research shows hunger negatively affects concentration and learning

Subsidy for school uniform and essential resources

Reduces stigma and improves attendance and inclusion

Leadership and staff professional learning focused on disadvantage

Estyn highlights strong leadership as critical to improving outcomes for disadvantaged pupils

Arts, sport and extra‑curricular participation

Evidence links wider participation with improved aspirations, confidence and social mobility

 

Total budgeted cost: £24,150

 

Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year

 

PDG outcomes

 

This details the impact that our PDG activity had on pupils in the 2025 to 2026 academic year.

Activity

Impact

Targeted literacy and numeracy interventions

Improved progress for FSM pupils; gaps starting to narrow

Wellbeing and mentoring support

Improved emotional regulation, engagement and attendance

Enrichment and extra‑curricular opportunities

Increased participation and improved pupil confidence

Practical support (food, uniform, trips)

Reduced barriers to learning and improved inclusion

 

Externally provided programmes

 

Please include the names of any programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help us identify which ones are popular in Wales.

Programme

Provider

Dyfal Donc / Catch Up Reading

External literacy providers

Nessy Learning Programme

Nessy

ELSA

Educational Psychology Service / Local Authority

 

Further information (optional)

 

Our PDG strategy is aligned with the School Development Plan and takes a holistic, whole‑school approach to addressing disadvantage. Funding decisions are informed by evidence‑based research, staff expertise and ongoing analysis of pupil need. The impact of PDG spending is regularly monitored by senior leaders and scrutinised by the Governing Body to ensure accountability and sustained improvement for pupils from low‑income households.